Informed Consent

News blog

YKIOK: Your Kink Is OK (22 Feb)
"No place in our society": Paul Goggins has died (8 Jan)
Protest against "Rape" Porn censorship law, London, 16 Dec '13 (21 Nov)
Submissive But Not Your Submissive (16 Sep)
More calls to criminalise possession of "rape" pornography (7 Jun)
more posts...

IC group on FetLife
- IC feed on FL
- UK events list

IC on Twitter

IC on Facebook

BDSM Rights
- Campaigns
- Organisations
- Other groups
- Documents

BDSM Flag
- Other symbols

Submissive But Not Your Submissive

About IC

© Informed Consent
1997-2014

This Guy Sounds Like A Barrell of Laughs!

Posted by TheMarquise on Thu 16 Feb 2012 to the BDSM Activism web board

What a miserable git - http://theactivists.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/why...

Reply by Flangemuncher on Thu 16 Feb 2012

TheMarquise wrote:
This Guy Sounds Like A Barrel of Laughs!

What a miserable git - http://theactivists.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/why...

I just don't get the Fascist Life-Style comment maybe Im not as bright as I think I am...

Reply by sasayaki on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Jeez arsehole.

Reply by RanDesu on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Let's not be too judgemental.

Obviously, this person is ill informed and not properly equipped with the mental faculty required to understand anything outside their own, limited, view of the world.

Sad, really.

I do pity such people.

Reply by A_Very_Good_Girl on Thu 16 Feb 2012

He's just pissed off that he failed to pull the bird.

Reply by d_c_sub_6148 on Thu 16 Feb 2012

I may have misread my French history, but, I've always thought that Sade was a revolutionary.

Reply by Baron_Morgan on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Got it in one, I reckon.

Funny article though. You can almost see the flecks of spittle escaping his lips as he writes.

A_Very_Good_Girl wrote:
He's just pissed off that he failed to pull the bird.

Reply by doulos on Thu 16 Feb 2012

There is quite a lot of this around on radical websites. Here is one from a blog i occasionally agree with: http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2012/02/07/b...

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." H. L. Mencken

Reply by gagmequick on Thu 16 Feb 2012

I agree. This guy is clearly one of these people who is incredibly ill-informed as to what we actually do, but also has an incredibly high opinion of his own intelligence. "I have this insight into the ways of the world, that is denied to lesser intellects, such as you!" Is the way some people operate. (I also like that he "explained" to his friend. Read that as "I gave her a lecture!" I can see him wagging his finger at her now!) At the end of the day, BDSM, is a very rich, creative Sub-culture which fulfils the needs of the people who are in it, so guys like that are just not important. Fascism is controlling what people think. We are not Fascist, because we don't care what he thinks, but who exactly is it who is trying to dominate the thoughts of somebody else here? Hmmmm....

Reply by nakedman on Thu 16 Feb 2012

He clearly has a secret - and he's afraid of it.

Reply by pleasureswitch on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Really more revoltin than revolutionary !

(prob end up on the Fox network)

"Yeah I like Kinky stuff,dirty dark pervy stuff,weird sex.... An' Yerself ?"

Award Winning Switch.

Reply by AkaPeter on Thu 16 Feb 2012

TheMarquise wrote:
. . . What a miserable git . . .

Not just miserable, but arrogant, patronising, intolerant, dismissive, opinionated, blinkered, judgemental . . . (oh sorry; pot, meet kettle!)

P.

Looking for adventure, and whatever comes our way [Steppenwolf]

Backlash

Reply by wqefowpiahvawdv on Thu 16 Feb 2012

I particularly like the way he used the handy system of comment control to prevent us stupid reactionaries from resisting, rebelling or confronting *him*. Clever that, very clever.

Reply by Betony on Thu 16 Feb 2012

It made me laugh. Should I be more affronted than I am.

One syllable short of a full haiku

Reply by Flangemuncher on Thu 16 Feb 2012

d_c_sub_6148 wrote:
I may have misread my French history, but, I've always thought that Sade was a revolutionary.
I tend to agree IMO " Smooth Operator " was ground breaking such a subtle use of the Tenor Sax.

Reply by teufel_tanz on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Betony wrote:

It made me laugh. Should I be more affronted than I am.

I thought it was quite funny. Then again I guess it all depends on your circle of friends / experiences. If I didn't know many people into BDSM, didn't like it myself, and my view was informed by a couple of clubs I'd heard about, newspaper stories, watched some of the late night US sex 'documentaries' or items like the fetish one on 'the joy of teen sex' then my view of BDSM would be far different.

Reply by black_rose30 on Thu 16 Feb 2012

RanDesu wrote:
Let's not be too judgemental.

Obviously, this person is ill informed and not properly equipped with the mental faculty required to understand anything outside their own, limited, view of the world.

Yeah but even so... Whatever happened to 'live and let live'? Im not sure that anyone's lifestyle choice (as long as its legal and doesn't harm others - well not without their consent, anyway!) should be subject to public censure...

Suppose that's idealistic.

I *would* like to say that this person is a bona fide knobend though. (Boner fide?)

br X

Reply by sharky1168 on Thu 16 Feb 2012

A_Very_Good_Girl wrote:
He's just pissed off that he failed to pull the bird.
^ ^ ^ ^ Have to agree with this, the intellect and conclusions drawn in this rant - whats with 'reactionary' new favourite word? - do seem to point towards a jealous and rejected teenage boy...who secretly fancies Lady Gaga
Reply by x_x_x_x on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Not clear to me why he/she is conflating revolution and BDSM. he clearly likes the former and dislikes the latter but hasn't the ability to separate revolution and sexual enjoyment in his own mind. He is taking a sample size of 1 (assuming he is recounting a real event) and generalising to everyone and even then on a very flimsy basis. It seems that it is revolution that he sees as exciting and horn-making. Each to his own, but revolutionaries who think that way are often the most dangerous to their supposed beneficiaries in my opinion.

Reply by forum_surfer on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Someone fell out of the wrong side of bed and hit the keyboard.

This is an argument predicated on ignorance and so makes an easy target for nitpickers like me.

The author is a fascist without apparently realising it. He or she is unaccepting of other peoples choices that don't cause grief for anyone else.

At the very least this post doesn't advocate live and let live.

S&M is just another name for fascism. I don't see any dommes kicking down my door, dragging me away and forcing me to a wear PVC maid uniform before utterly degrading me this way and that, (I wish they would though as it is a favourite fantasy of mine).

Maybe BDSM is expensive and perhaps can involve risk of personal injury. The same can be said of many sports and other kinds of activities.

Instead comrades your endeavours would be more wisely invested in revolution. History has shown revolution too often simply leads to another form of dictatorship.

There are problems in any society and they are often the consequences of illiberal and ignorant people.

EDITED: because I had missed a few words out.

Reply by Naughty_Amelia_Jane on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Oh dear! :-( that article and the blog made me feel really bad about myself. It's like they really hate us!

And why go on about how stupid and corny we are? It's not like all sex isn't a bit silly.

I'm going to go hug my teddy bear. He says I'm okay just as I am! :-) and he says the rest of you are just fine too!

AJ xxx

Reply by gagmequick on Thu 16 Feb 2012

I like that he's using Rihanna and Lady Gaga as some sort of Representitive of the Lifestyle! Thats Pop-BDSM! (If there is such a thing!)

Reply by d_c_sub_6148 on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Hanchi wrote:
d_c_sub_6148 wrote:
I may have misread my French history, but, I've always thought that Sade was a revolutionary.
I tend to agree IMO " Smooth Operator " was ground breaking such a subtle use of the Tenor Sax.

Ah, the old ones are the best.

Reply by TuvaOrBust on Thu 16 Feb 2012

syndeetoo wrote:
Guy? He sounds like a 13 year old. Revolution maaaaaaaan, yeah.

That's what I thought; he/she comes across as being very immature and very bitter. If S&M didn't exist, I'm pretty confident that he/she would have written something in the same vein about something else.

Reply by Lady_Susan on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Naughty_Amelia_Jane wrote:
Oh dear! :-( that article and the blog made me feel really bad about myself. It's like they really hate us!

And why go on about how stupid and corny we are? It's not like all sex isn't a bit silly.

I'm going to go hug my teddy bear. He says I'm okay just as I am! :-) and he says the rest of you are just fine too!

AJ xxx

Amelia Jane, do not let boring saddos (who can't bear anyone having any fun if they don't see it personally), get you down: unfortunately there are plenty of them out there, but there are also plenty of intelligent, happy, fun-loving and tolerant peeps out there, too.

Any idiot can post a blog; and what kind of revolutionary is he, anyway? Not into free-thinking, for a start - but that's not unusual for revolutionaries, after all.

I've got a kind of Rik from the Young Ones type in my mind - only without the charm or the sex appeal!

When I want your opinion, I'll thrash it out of you.

Can you taste the grit between your teeth....

Reply by natbornsub on Thu 16 Feb 2012

lol. its just a crummy blog from what i can see...his opinion all be it a fuckin daft one. pointless even trying to argue or reason with rubbish like this. I started rolling my eyes at 'lady gagas pathetic costumes', then gave up not long after that...

I bet the blogger gets a lazy lob-on checking his page view counter; looser. O.P what were you doing reading it anyway? Just dont read the crap it only encourages them.

Reply by natbornsub on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Ironic; blogger doesn't get that he is being a fascist.

Reply by Lady_Susan on Thu 16 Feb 2012

natbornsub wrote:
Ironic; blogger doesn't get that he is being a fascist.

That's one of the probs with the internet - any opinionated twerp can set up a blog and fool himself that he is preaching to the breathless hordes.

When I want your opinion, I'll thrash it out of you.

Can you taste the grit between your teeth....

Reply by wqefowpiahvawdv on Thu 16 Feb 2012

AstronautMikeDexter wrote:
The article in OP's link is clearly garbage. Yet there is a completely cogent queer and/or anarchist analysis of BDSM culture which argues that the way BDSM constructed, thought about and commoditised at best recapitulates and at worst reinforces both hetero-normativity and capitalist/consumerist practices.

would be interesting to see more discussion of that on the boards...

Reply by Cal451 on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Seems this guy is totally unfamiliar with the saying 'Each To Their Own'.

So what if his friend spends a lot of cash on fetish stuff. Some people spend a fortune following lower league football teams and train spotting. It's their cash, their choice and I'm sure they get something out of it. In other words 'it's their thing'.

Don't really like people who can't understand and think you've got it totally wrong because you're not like them.

Reply by OneKinkySlut on Thu 16 Feb 2012

I notice comments are closed and theres no author name on it.....I wonder why? It seems like its posted to rile people up but then no one can comment. Pretty gutless. As for politics, I avoid them too, I understand why this 'friend' isnt interested. And what is this Nazi connection that people who have no understanding of this lifestyle seem to constantly bring into it? Its odd, they are making themselves appear totally dumb with their ignorance.

Reply by Mistress_Anarchy on Thu 16 Feb 2012

For me BDSM is a revolution, played well it can be Anarchy.

Reply by OneKinkySlut on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Cal451 wrote:
Seems this guy is totally unfamiliar with the saying 'Each To Their Own'.

So what if his friend spends a lot of cash on fetish stuff. Some people spend a fortune following lower league football teams and train spotting. It's their cash, their choice and I'm sure they get something out of it. In other words 'it's their thing'.

Don't really like people who can't understand and think you've got it totally wrong because you're not like them.

He has a real bad chip on his shoulder. Its her cash and she can do what she wants with it, even flush it down to loo if she likes! Sounds like he has nothing better to do than rant and probably isnt enjoying his life like she is.

Reply by spreadb4u on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Well obviously anyone with a grain of intelligence and a modicum of grammar or grasp of the English language does not use the word "stupid" in the way this so called intelligent person has done in their article. Perhaps its that same intelligence they use in order to come to the conclusion they have about BDSM.

Moreover, to compare BDSM with activism and to aline it with fascism is fascist in itself.

Sad git indeed.

Reply by EmperorFred on Thu 16 Feb 2012

d_c_sub_6148 wrote:
I may have misread my French history, but, I've always thought that Sade was a revolutionary.

He was in a way, but he was more of an opportunist than anything else. He tried to enter politics in 1790s France, which makes him a revolutionary by default.

Moreover, he was very lucky twice over. He narrowly escaped being in the Bastille when it was stormed, as the governer had become fed up of him shouting abuse at passers-by from the windows a few weeks earlier. Had he been an inmate at the time, there is a chance that, as an aristocrat, he would have been lynched like the governer was. However, as he was there under a lettre de cachet, it's more likely he would have been lauded. His real luck came when, a few years later after his entry into politics, he managed to criticise Robespierre and merely get sacked. Had he said the same things a few months later, he would probably have been executed.

Reply by Goddess_Asphyxia on Thu 16 Feb 2012

TheMarquise wrote:
This Guy Sounds Like A Barrel of Laughs!

What a miserable git - http://theactivists.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/why...

Good god ! what a load of utter ill informed twaddle ! Who was the arse who wrote this load of crap ? ;)

'Taste the whip, in love, not given lightly......taste the whip, now plead for Me !'

Reply by Loki_The_Elder on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Actually I agree with almost all of his words in the last paragraph, unfortunately he missed a couple and they seem to have come out in the wrong order.

I believe he meant to say:

"The way I see it, If you want a thrill in your life confront the system, revolt, resist, rebel, instead of obeying your Dom(me) and calling it sexual freedom. If you want for risk, wrap up your body with latex and stand against something."

Success shall crown my endeavours. Wherefore not? Thus far I have followed a secure way over the pathless seas, the very stars bear witness and testimony to my triumph and failure. Why not still proceed over the untamed yet obedient element? What can stop a determined heart and the resolve of a man?

Reply by Ama_Sidero on Thu 16 Feb 2012

gagmequick wrote:
I agree. This guy is clearly one of these people who is incredibly ill-informed as to what we actually do, but also has an incredibly high opinion of his own intelligence. "I have this insight into the ways of the world, that is denied to lesser intellects, such as you!" Is the way some people operate. (I also like that he "explained" to his friend. Read that as "I gave her a lecture!" I can see him wagging his finger at her now!) At the end of the day, BDSM, is a very rich, creative Sub-culture which fulfils the needs of the people who are in it, so guys like that are just not important. Fascism is controlling what people think. We are not Fascist, because we don't care what he thinks, but who exactly is it who is trying to dominate the thoughts of somebody else here? Hmmmm....

^^This

@Play_Space - Next party is Friday, March 2, 2012 and the first Friday of every month!

Road Trip to the Sea!!! The October trip has tJust elapsed...More info here.

Reply by TheMarquise on Thu 16 Feb 2012

AstronautMikeDexter wrote:
The article in OP's link is clearly garbage. Yet there is a completely cogent queer and/or anarchist analysis of BDSM culture which argues that the way BDSM constructed, thought about and commoditised at best recapitulates and at worst reinforces both hetero-normativity and capitalist/consumerist practices.

Which is one of the many discussions which would be interesting to have @The_Anarchist_Munch.

Diverse analysis, expressed in a spirit of respect, is to be expected and welcomed at the Anarchist kinky munch.

My personal understanding of an anarchist approach to BDSM would include notions of an open mind, honesty, a promotion of freedom and a critique of exploitation.

Reply by TheMarquise on Thu 16 Feb 2012

natbornsub wrote:
lol. its just a crummy blog from what i can see...his opinion all be it a fuckin daft one. pointless even trying to argue or reason with rubbish like this. I started rolling my eyes at 'lady gagas pathetic costumes', then gave up not long after that...

I bet the blogger gets a lazy lob-on checking his page view counter; looser. O.P what were you doing reading it anyway? Just dont read the crap it only encourages them.

I read a lot of things, not just from those that share the same outlook as myself.

Reply by Phallocrat_London on Thu 16 Feb 2012

A_Very_Good_Girl wrote:
He's just pissed off that he failed to pull the bird.

^^^that

The answer is still 42... Don't Panic!

Reply by pleasureswitch on Thu 16 Feb 2012

Mistress_Anarchy wrote:
For me BDSM is a revolution, played well it can be Anarchy.

*likes*

"Yeah I like Kinky stuff,dirty dark pervy stuff,weird sex.... An' Yerself ?"

Award Winning Switch.

Reply by TheMarquise on Thu 16 Feb 2012

pleasureswitch wrote:
Mistress_Anarchy wrote:
For me BDSM is a revolution, played well it can be Anarchy.

*likes*

Me too, please expand, preferably on the Anarchist Munch thread?

Reply by jungle_balls on Thu 16 Feb 2012

TheMarquise wrote:
This Guy Sounds Like A Barrell of Laughs!

What a miserable git - http://theactivists.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/why...

A few words other than miserable spring to my mind - words like stupid, vindictive, Marxist (or at the very least socialist extremist - the text has many of the rhetorical hallmarks and cliches), and deluded. For all this person's love of individuality, he displays a woeful willingness to be brainwashed by the idealogues.

It's obvious to me that, whatever antics the Ladies Gaga, Madonna et al get up to, I do my own thing without being influenced one jot. People do BDSM because it gives them pleasure, not because the {insert uber-duber secret society name here} seeks to influence them.

I mean, for fuck's sake...

My Grandma had a pair of boots,

My Grandpa had some too:

They met some skinheads yesterday

And kicked them black and blue.

-

Salad is a dish best served cold.

Reply by Aristaeus on Thu 23 Feb 2012

A_Very_Good_Girl wrote:
He's just pissed off that he failed to pull the bird.

You got there before I did! 100% agree!! :)>

Reply by valleyrose17 on Thu 23 Feb 2012

Isn't it funny that some people who porport to be anarchists and revoltionaries rebelling against the rules and laws of the land get so upset that we are not following THEIR rules and feel that we should be doing things THEIR way.....

"Fear is that little darkroom where negatives are developed" Michael Pritchard

"Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall in love with a gorgeous redhead" - Lucille Ball

Reply by Once_upon_a_rhyme on Thu 23 Feb 2012

Heh heh. Thought it was quite funny.

"We're all wankers here," said the cat, "You're a wanker. I'm a wanker."

"How do you know I'm a wanker?" asked Alice.

"You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here."

Reply by s1aveguy on Thu 23 Feb 2012

This article is very naive and the author obviously has failed to investigate below the surface of what BDSM is all about. That said I can see how the author has misunderstood the whole point. Let's be honest beating the crap out of someone even with their consent can be construed as reactionary. At face value the lifestyle does seem to be stepping back to the past, when slavery was prevalent and corporal punishment in public was encouraged by the state.

However, and the big caveat with the author's argument is a serious failure to grasp that the human psyche goes further than just trying to be so called model citizens within a utopian society. Everyone has psychological paradoxes and lived through past experiences that have deeply moulded their subconscious, and this place is often not clean and clinical. The author blatantly has not acknowledged this, which is reminiscent of closet gay Tory MP's that were totally in denial and against the gay movement during the 1980s.

If god intended us to be vanilla there would be no chocolate chilli mango, now would there?

Reply by Im_Bound on Thu 23 Feb 2012

What a laugh! Shes happy,He is not what a shame..lol.

Reply by MsKsbottom on Thu 23 Feb 2012 (modified Fri 24 Feb 2012)

The_Majickian wrote:

A few words other than miserable spring to my mind - words like Marxist (or at the very least socialist extremist - the text has many of the rhetorical hallmarks and cliches

Can't you be kinky and socialist, are you using marxist as an insult?

Reigning LUXE Sadoquiz champion :)

Reply by MasterTitanyum on Thu 1 Mar 2012

Definitely the sound of someone who doesn't know bdsm let alone experienced it...sad and pathetic

Reply by Ishmael on Thu 1 Mar 2012

Prim_rose wrote:
Isn't it funny that some people who porport to be anarchists and revoltionaries rebelling against the rules and laws of the land get so upset that we are not following THEIR rules and feel that we should be doing things THEIR way.....

Reminds me of my one appearence on Kilroy; the debate concluded with the enemy declaring that SM was 'all about power', while the only people that seemed particularly interested in power were the enemy - wanting the power to stop people having kinky sex.

(and that evening the police marched into Club Whiplash)

Cultivate a reputation for eccentricity, then you can do pretty much as you damn well like.

Reply by Ishmael on Thu 1 Mar 2012

The_Majickian wrote:
A few words other than miserable spring to my mind - words like stupid, vindictive, Marxist (or at the very least socialist extremist - the text has many of the rhetorical hallmarks and cliches), and deluded.

I was never aware that Marxism and Socialism were so focussed against SM.

Cultivate a reputation for eccentricity, then you can do pretty much as you damn well like.

Reply by johnstar on Thu 1 Mar 2012

Is that what the Fascists do? Uber fun!

Reply by CookieMonster on Thu 1 Mar 2012

Ishmael wrote:
The_Majickian wrote:
A few words other than miserable spring to my mind - words like stupid, vindictive, Marxist (or at the very least socialist extremist - the text has many of the rhetorical hallmarks and cliches), and deluded.

I was never aware that Marxism and Socialism were so focussed against SM.

As I know you are not stupid I would say its denial.

They are not facists but socialists/feminists. They are like the anti-semites that rant about Zionism but quickly move on to Jews.

The same with them. I read over half of the blog Doulos posted and bar one person sniggering about CBT they all start slagging BDSM but then quickly move on to Male Domination, not even giving Femdom lip service.

A Femalesubmissive confirms the idea of a victim of the patriarchy, a female dominant is a contradiction, an absurdity, a challenge?

A socialist-feminist submissive only has to deal with the guilt of endulging as the ideology would say, in victimhood. A femdom socialist-feminist has an even bigger task to square the circle.

To me this is obvious.

It would be this contradiction and their reaction to it which would be more interesting. But I doubt they are capable of geting their heads round the idea as they are so ideologicly baked.

Reply by undergroundted on Fri 2 Mar 2012

At least if he was stuck in a tiny space his mind would be able to slide through a narrow crack and get help ;)

Reply by Ishmael on Sat 31 Mar 2012

CookieMonster wrote:
Ishmael wrote:
The_Majickian wrote:
A few words other than miserable spring to my mind - words like stupid, vindictive, Marxist (or at the very least socialist extremist - the text has many of the rhetorical hallmarks and cliches), and deluded.

I was never aware that Marxism and Socialism were so focussed against SM.

As I know you are not stupid I would say its denial.

They are not facists but socialists/feminists. They are like the anti-semites that rant about Zionism but quickly move on to Jews.

Mmm... I'm not sure which part of Das Kapital says 'It is bourgeois to have kinky sex' - I have been told by Socialists that tying one's lover up and whipping him/her is bourgeois, but I'm not sure where Marx said so.

Of course, it may have been Engels, or Trotsky, or Lenin, but I don't really think it was any of them.

In the same way, I don't thnk Jesus ever said it either.

Rather in all cases, it seems to have been inferred by various people that just don't like the idea, and thereby turned into dogma in order to make other people only have the kind of sex that censorious third parties want them to have, and when those sort of people tell you that it means you are allowed to hit them.

CookieMonster wrote:
The same with them. I read over half of the blog Doulos posted and bar one person sniggering about CBT they all start slagging BDSM but then quickly move on to Male Domination, not even giving Femdom lip service.

A Femalesubmissive confirms the idea of a victim of the patriarchy, a female dominant is a contradiction, an absurdity, a challenge?

One colluding with the oppressor, the other conforming to an oppressive male fantasy (in which men are bound, beaten and degraded, and frequently pay women to be allowed to be. I didn't understand, in the 1980s, why this was oppressive to women, but my Socialism may have been faulty; it may still be).

CookieMonster wrote:
A socialist-feminist submissive only has to deal with the guilt of endulging as the ideology would say, in victimhood. A femdom socialist-feminist has an even bigger task to square the circle.

Well yes, if we accept that sex is a political act, rather than something one just does to get one's rocks off; I've always held that it's too important to take seriously.

If it is a political act, then both the fem sub and fem dom are expressing their sexuality as part of the freedoms implicit in the Revolution - providing, of course, they are not doing so with Imperialist, Sun-reading, Capitalist Counter-Revolutionary Running Dogs, because that would be very wrong.

CookieMonster wrote:

It would be this contradiction and their reaction to it which would be more interesting. But I doubt they are capable of geting their heads round the idea as they are so ideologicly baked.

I'll finish this later.

ETA One of the features of Socialism in the 1980s seemed to be a very powerful anger at the inequities of Thatcher, and a great frustration that nothing (including the IRA) would stop the wretched woman, and that anger seemed to find a focus on the nearest target, whoever it happened to be, preferably someone whose behaviour was bourgeois in some way - if one enjoyed sex one was sexist, if one wore fur one was a murderer of cute* animals - and those people tended to be either isolated or weak (I remember Nottingham Animal Rights targetting old ladies), and so much safer to attack than the Tory oppressor.

*and mink. There is sod-all cute about a mink.

Cultivate a reputation for eccentricity, then you can do pretty much as you damn well like.

Reply by mia on Sat 31 Mar 2012

Is it weird to have sex as a non-political statement? I'm barmier than i thought if so.

Must go, i need to go not be bothered about something and not wear latex a bit more.

[/Doing it wrong]

x

Now where were we? Ah, yes - abject humiliation!

@Modified_Bodies

@O_and_P

@LGB_Forum

@Globetrotters

Reply by Dragonfyre on Sat 31 Mar 2012

That blog looks to me like the sort of blog that's been set up to get traffic and advertising revenue. As such it collects fairly useless little articles and just puts them online. The article linked here has no real point, and seems to be purely written to make the reader either agree completely or get wound up. There's no in-between, there's not even a coherent argument being made.

At the top of the page is a set of links for different categories, and at the end is a "submit your work" link. I suspect this blog will publish anything and everything if it thinks it'll get some page views from it.

Adblock highly recommended :)

Reply by The_Vicar on Mon 2 Apr 2012

Somewhere else today I read that:

Anonimity + Audience = Arsehole

John the Vicar

Reply by master_for_maid on Mon 2 Apr 2012

Ishmael wrote:
The_Majickian wrote:
A few words other than miserable spring to my mind - words like stupid, vindictive, Marxist (or at the very least socialist extremist - the text has many of the rhetorical hallmarks and cliches), and deluded.

I was never aware that Marxism and Socialism were so focussed against SM.

Well lets be honest, Marxism and Socialism are against anything that involves having fun. Let them all listen to Billy Bragg and Morrissey and wallow in their own self pity, and leave the rest of us alone to enjoy ourselves.

Reply by SlutBoy2000 on Mon 2 Apr 2012

TheMarquise wrote:
This Guy Sounds Like A Barrell of Laughs!

What a miserable git - http://theactivists.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/why...

It's a point of view. Everyone's entitled to a point of view. The man's a frustrated revolutionary. He wants us to throw off our chains, while we are doing the exact opposite.